Why is Dick Durbin Trying to Undermine Social Security and Medicare?
Dick Durbin, doing his best to undermine social insurance and the long-term viability of the Democratic Party, is seeking to convince progressives to demobilize rather than fight attacks on Social Security and Medicare.
A top Democrat pressured fellow progressives Tuesday to support – rather than fight – a far-reaching budget deal that includes cuts to entitlement programs after resolving the upcoming fiscal cliff.
“We can’t be so naive to believe that just taxing the rich will solve our problems,” said Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois, the No. 2 Democrat in the Senate. “Put everything on the table. Repeat. Everything on the table.”
This is nonsense. Why on earth should everything be on the table? Even if it was true that deficits were out of control (they aren’t) and that we had to act now to address them (we don’t), things that don’t contribute to the deficit at all – like Social Security – shouldn’t be part of the conversation. But beyond that, it’s just false. Vastly popular, wildly successful programs that happen to be unpopular with elites shouldn’t be “on the table.”
This is how Social Security and Medicare ends – with false progressive officials, supposedly liberal commentators like Kevin Drum, and compromised organizations like the AARP all shifting the terms of the debate so we’re only talking about how to cut benefits not whether, let alone how to expand these programs.
As I said in my last post, never trust anyone who extolls the value of a political deal without talking about the substance of the deal.
If people like Durbin can float these sort of claims without being punished for it, everyone in Washington will know that they can go after these programs without consequences. If, on the other hand, he is made suffer, few will want to be next in line. Social insurance is only vulnerable if we fail to mobilize to protect it. Which is why this sort of thing is unforgivable.
For what its worth, Durbin holds the number two position in the Senate. As the whip, his job is to get Democrats to vote correctly. He represents everyone else in the caucus. It strikes me that every member of the Democratic caucus should face angry constituents demanding that they condemn him.
Written by David Kaib
November 28, 2012 at 11:53 pm
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged with AARP, austerity, Medicare, mobilization, Social Insurance, Social Security
2 Responses
Subscribe to comments with RSS.
[…] scare tactics to make cuts seems inevitable, should be viciously attacked. They could start with Dick Durbin or Chris Van Hollen (“Mr. Van Hollen also said changing Social Security and increasing the […]
Drawing Lines on Social Insurance: Turning Tough Talk into Pressure « Notes on a Theory…
November 30, 2012 at 9:44 am
[…] people use this language because they are intent on attacking these programs or because they are bad at politics doesn’t matter. We should call this what it is and point out the reasons for it and demand […]
Entitlement Means Right | Notes on a Theory...
October 11, 2013 at 9:50 am